Re: IP over DVB-S2 requirements draft

["Axel Jahn, TriaGnoSys GmbH" <Axel.Jahn@triagnosys.com>]

Dear colleagues,

as Gorry pointed out, the TM-GBS working group of DVB is working on an
encapsulation protocol for S2 Generic Streams as well. The group is now
editing a requirement document (which includes as well simulation
assumptions for performance evaluation). As it would definitely make
sense to exchange this document, I will ask the GBS group to release the
document to ipdvb.

regards, Axel

Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

>
> At the moment, the above I-D is an individual submission, and it is
> not chartered as a working group work item. I still do encourage
> discussion of this on the ipdvb WG list, not only because there may be
> opportunities for defining common methods (e.g. with ULE) for header
> compression, security, and other extensions; but because there is a
> body of expertise in this community that could usefully contribute
> thinking on this topic.
>
> As regards the DVB-S2 encapsulation study group of DVB-GS, activity
> has been slow over the summer months. The next event will be a
> document outlining requirements for evaluation of possible methods -
> which is currently a work in progress within the study group. This is
> expected soon, and then work on protocol detail may begin with the
> study group.
>
> The chair of the study group is on this email list (as are many
> members of the DVB study group and ETSI).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Gorry
> (ipdvb WG Chair)
>
> Rod.Walsh@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Juan
>>  
>> Has there been any follow up on the DVB-S2 liaisons following the action
>> point in IETF63? If so, please keep the email list up to date with
>> progress.
>>  
>> If not, you'll keep banging against the same wall: "is this really of
>> benefit to the internet community without DVB-S2 adoption?" (The answer
>> being "no", unless there's some major innovation in standards
>> procedures!)
>>  
>> Sorry to be the wet blanket in this, just that it seems sensible only to
>> employ your talent in the IETF on something which offers realistic
>> chances of deployment.
>>  
>> (BTW, this only applies to WG adoption of the draft, and I'm happy to
>> see individual efforts for academic or any interest, though I got the
>> impression you are aiming at WG adoption).
>>  
>> Cheers, Rod.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>>     From: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
>> [mailto:owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk] On Behalf Of ext Juan Cantillo
>>     Sent: 30 September, 2005 14:50
>>     To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
>>     Subject: IP over DVB-S2 requirements draft
>>     
>>     
>>     Dear all,
>>          Following the 63th meeting discussions, we have produced a
>> brand-new version of our document concerning the IP/DVB-S2 issues. The
>> I-D "draft-cantillo-ipdvb-s2encaps-01.txt" si bnow available online
>> at:          
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cantillo-ipdvb-s2encaps-01.txt
>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cantillo-ipdvb-s2encaps-01.tx
>> t>          We look forward to discussing the draft together in
>> Vancouver.
>> Of course, we warmly encourage you to take a look at it from now;
>> comments, questions and remarks are most welcome via @.
>>          Best regards,
>>     
>>     
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Juan CANTILLO - SatComs PhD. Researcher
>>     Tel +33 6 23 54 59 65- Fax  +33 5 61 61 86 88
>>     ENST/TeSA/ENSICA/AAS, Toulouse, FR
>>               
>>
>>
>
>