[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Descriptor.]

To: ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: Re: New Descriptor.]
From: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@udcast.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:22:12 +0200
In-reply-to: <> (clausen@cosy.sbg.ac.at)

"Kearney" <clausen@cosy.sbg.ac.at> wrote:

> I think this is absolute overkill - to address 2^28 multicast groups or
> individual stations in ONE PID stream is unrealistic. And remember: every
> bit counts.

How many addresses do you think is realistic?
I don't understand why we should not allow the full IP adresses scope
on one PID.

Patrick.
-- 
UDcast: Full IP over Broadcast Media

Phone:  (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 99
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 14 21 55 98
Fax:    (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 61                 http://www.UDcast.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Descriptor.]
  - From: "Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher" <dent@cosy.sbg.ac.at>

References:
- Re: New Descriptor.]
  - From: "Kearney" <clausen@cosy.sbg.ac.at>

Prev by Date: (4 bits from PID * 24 bits from @link_sat_adress) == 28 bits.
Next by Date: Self routing
Previous by thread: Re: (4 bits from PID * 24 bits from @link_sat_adress) == 28 bits.
Next by thread: Re: New Descriptor.]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread