[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on ULE extension header....
On Ethernet bridging...
On 8/6/04 12:59 pm, "William StanisLaus" <williams@calsoft.co.in> wrote:
> Please see the comments inlined...
>
> -William.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
>> [mailto:owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Gorry Fairhurst
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 3:20 PM
>> To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
>> Cc: Bernhard Collini-Nocker
>> Subject: Re: Comments on ULE extension header....
>>
>>
>> On 7/6/04 7:30 pm, "williams@calsoft.co.in"
>> <williams@calsoft.co.in> wrote:
<snip>
>
>
>>> In Optional headers, Wish to add Source mac address... In case of
>>> UDLR(RFC3077), during DTCP announcement, ULE can take the
>> source mac i.e.
>>> FUMAC makes simple in address resolution. -UDLR is jst an example.
>>> otherthings are security filters can be implemented based
>> on source MAC.
>>>
>>
>> Yes - this is true.
>>
>> We had a discussion on this topic at the Vienna BoF, and at
>> that time I
>> don't recall a need for a MAC source without a MAC
>> destination address. If
>> that is still the case, then maybe the bridging format extension would
>> satisfy this requirement?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> William> In case of UDLR, it is not a packet forwarding, the orginator
> of the packet is the FEED itself i.e. satellite terminal. My understand
> with bridged format packets is sending the ethernet packets along with
> L2 information in satellite network, i.e. L2 tunneling. In that you
> still have outer ULE and MPEG headers.
> Please correct if I'm wrong.
>
So I'd guess if you wanted a source MAC address, an example is:
<base ULE header, (D=1)> <Bridging header><payload><crc-32>
I.e.:
<Len,Type=bridging, (D=1)> <MAC-dst;MAC-src;Ether-Type><payload><crc-32>
>>
>>> -William
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>>> http://mail2web.com/ .
>>>
>>
>> Gorry Fairhurst
>>>
>>
>