Do we class IP with an MPLS shim as IP, or non-IP, traffic?
L.
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, H.Cruickshank wrote:
Hi John,
Security support to carry non-IP traffic is useful, but there is no
compelling reason to make this a priority. So the first step for the
security work progress is to focus on the security requirements to carry
IP traffic.
Haitham
--
Dr. Haitham S. Cruickshank
Lecturer
Communications Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR)
School of Electronics, Computing and Mathematics
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK
Tel: +44 1483 686007 (indirect 689844)
Fax: +44 1483 686011
e-mail: H.Cruickshank@surrey.ac.uk
http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/H.Cruickshank/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk [mailto:owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk] On
Behalf Of John Border
Sent: 03 August 2005 16:35
To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: Non-IP Protocol Support
I can understand why it is desirable to be able to carry non-IP
traffic. But, I would prefer to get a solution for security that
supports IP over DVB even if it doesn't support non-IP protocols than to
not have a solution. Is there a compelling reason to include securing
non-IP traffic in the problem space right now?
John
<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>