RE: ULE encryption Support.

["Bernhard Collini-Nocker" <bnocker@cosy.sbg.ac.at>]

Hello,

[snip]
>
> Bits are bucks for broadcasters, and each one has a fixed pipe size, so we
> must resist sending any more than absolutely needed.  I can make
> a case for
> NO expansion bit, as the new service can be defined when the
> application is
> defined and new devices can process it -- but 1 bit per header is ok.

Do you think it would be wise to introduce another one or two bits telling
the receiver what to do if the (optional) next header is not understood:
- discard packet
- ignore header
or something else?

Any opinions?

Bernhard