Re: Corrections/Evolutions for ULE draft

[alain.ritoux@6wind.com]

Marie-Jose Montpetit wrote:
> I actually doubt that any satellite system will ever be attached directly to
> the core networks :-)
>
> I am more concerned by the probability of loss in the satellite channel (no
> flame from the PHY guys please, I know the link is almost error free but
> almost is not fully). Hence the probability that one segment of a packet is
> lost is proportional to the number of fragments and then the whole things
> may be lost (if no higher layer recovery mechanisms) so much to say for the
> savings of encapsulations. I would vote for 16k.

btw, for my personnal culture, does somebody know the residual bit error 
rate of TS cells, (i.e. after corrector codes) on satelite links ? or at
least the order of mangitude, or the common values if there are
different kind od DVB links ?

Thanks,
Alain.
--
Alain RITOUX
Tel +33-1-39-30-92-32
Fax +33-1-39-30-92-11
visit our web http://www.6wind.com