RE: Differences between INT and MMT tables for address resolution?

[<toni.paila@nokia.com>]

Good question, Frank.

Indeed, I have not heard of MMT. Perhaps you can enlighten us all!

>From my point of view, INT is all that you need. Both unicast and multicast (ASM/ISM and SSM). And for MAC, IPv4 and IPv6.

BR,
 Toni


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Frank.Zeppenfeldt@esa.int [mailto:Frank.Zeppenfeldt@esa.int]
> Sent: 19 December, 2002 14:39
> To: IP-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
> Subject: Differences between INT and MMT tables for address 
> resolution?
> 
> 
> Before delving into the DVB archives, does somebody know:
> 
> a. Where the Multicast Map Table is officially defined ? Is 
> there a DVB
> reference ?
> 
> b. What is the relation between the INT (IP/MAC Notification 
> Table) , as
> defined in ETSI EN Draft 301 192 v1.3.1 (2002-12) ? In 
> addition to offering
> unicast/MAC streams/platform concept, is it  making the MMT 
> obsolete  ? Is
> there a reference to minutes of some DVB meeting that 
> explains the relation
> between the two ?
> 
> My understanding is that EN 301 192 v1.3.1 (DVB data 
> broadcasting)  document
> now includes the document referenced in Gorries report from 
> Atlanta (ETSI EN
> drTS 102 00X V0.4.2 (2002-07) "Specification for IP 
> Notification in DVB
> Systems Use of the IP/MAC Notification Table").
> 
> 
> Regards, Frank
> 
> 
> 
>